Published on:

Court considered a product liability claim based on an injury from a table saw. Whitaker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 120 A.D.3d 865 (2d Dep’t 2014)

by

Whitaker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. is a product liability case that was decided by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York in 2014. The case involved a plaintiff, Michael Whitaker, who was injured while using a table saw that he had purchased from Sears. The decision of the court in this case is important because it provides guidance on the extent of a manufacturer’s duty to warn consumers about the dangers associated with their products.

Factual Background
In 2003, Michael Whitaker purchased a table saw from Sears. The table saw was designed and manufactured by Rexon Industrial Corp., a Taiwanese company. The saw was sold under the Craftsman brand, which is owned by Sears. The saw came equipped with a blade guard and anti-kickback pawls, which are safety features designed to prevent serious injuries.

In 2005, while using the saw, Whitaker’s hand slipped and came into contact with the blade, causing him to suffer severe injuries. Whitaker alleged that the saw was defectively designed and lacked adequate warnings about the dangers associated with its use. Specifically, Whitaker claimed that the saw’s blade guard and anti-kickback pawls were inadequate and that the saw should have been equipped with a flesh-sensing safety device, which would have automatically shut off the saw when it came into contact with human flesh.

Whitaker filed a lawsuit against Sears and Rexon, alleging that they were negligent in the design, manufacture, and sale of the saw. The case went to trial, and the jury found in favor of Whitaker. Sears and Rexon appealed the decision.

Decision
The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York upheld the jury’s decision and denied the defendants’ appeal. The court held that the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to support the jury’s finding that the saw was defectively designed and lacked adequate warnings. The court also rejected the defendants’ argument that Whitaker’s own negligence was the cause of his injuries.

In reaching its decision, the court relied on the testimony of several expert witnesses who testified about the dangers associated with table saws and the available safety features. The court found that the saw was defectively designed because it lacked a flesh-sensing safety device, which would have automatically shut off the saw when it came into contact with human flesh. The court also found that the saw’s blade guard and anti-kickback pawls were inadequate.

Discussion
The decision in Whitaker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. is significant because it highlights the duty of manufacturers to design and sell safe products and to provide adequate warnings about the dangers associated with their products. The court’s decision in this case supports the principle that manufacturers must take steps to prevent foreseeable injuries that may result from the use of their products.

In the context of table saws, manufacturers have a duty to design saws that are equipped with appropriate safety features, such as flesh-sensing safety devices, which can prevent serious injuries. Manufacturers also have a duty to provide adequate warnings about the dangers associated with their products, such as the risks of using a saw without a flesh-sensing safety device.

The decision in Whitaker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. also highlights the importance of expert testimony in product liability cases. In this case, the court relied on the testimony of several expert witnesses to determine whether the saw was defectively designed and whether it lacked adequate warnings. Expert testimony can be critical in establishing the standard of care that manufacturers must follow and in demonstrating that a particular product was defectively designed or lacked adequate warnings.

Conclusion
The decision in Whitaker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. highlights the importance of manufacturers’ responsibility to provide safe and properly functioning products to consumers. If you or a loved one have been injured by a defective product, it is important to consult with an experienced New York personal injury lawyer to discuss your legal options and to ensure that your rights are protected.

Contact Information