Published on:

Court found that the City of New York was liable for a bike accident due to poor signage. Fox v. City of New York, 157 A.D.2d 260 (1st Dep’t 1990)

by

Bicycling is becoming an increasingly popular mode of transportation in New York City, but it can be dangerous. One of the hazards that cyclists face is poor signage. Poor signage can cause bicycle accidents in a number of way.  Poor signage can cause misdirection. If there are no signs indicating where the bicycle lane is or if the signs are unclear or confusing, cyclists may be forced to ride in dangerous areas. If there are no signs warning cyclists of hazards ahead, such as steep hills, sharp turns, or intersections, they may not be prepared to slow down or change direction, which could result in a collision or loss of control. If there are different signs indicating different rules for cyclists in the same area, it can be confusing and lead to accidents. If signs are not visible due to poor lighting or obstructions, cyclists may not be aware of the rules or hazards ahead, increasing the risk of accidents. The case of Fox v. City of New York focuses on the importance of proper signage in ensuring the safety of cyclists on New York City streets.

Background
The plaintiff in Fox v. City of New York was riding his bicycle on 8th Avenue in Manhattan when he was hit by a car. The accident occurred at the intersection of 8th Avenue and 56th Street. The plaintiff was traveling south on 8th Avenue in the bicycle lane when he was hit by a car that was turning left from 56th Street onto 8th Avenue. The plaintiff suffered injuries to his face and mouth, as well as a broken finger.

The plaintiff sued the City of New York, claiming that the accident was caused by the city’s negligence in failing to provide adequate signage at the intersection. Specifically, the plaintiff argued that there were no signs indicating that the bicycle lane continued through the intersection, and that this lack of signage caused the driver of the car to turn left into the bicycle lane.

Discussion and Decision
The court found that the City of New York was negligent in failing to provide adequate signage at the intersection. The court noted that the intersection was located in a heavily traveled area, and that there were many signs in the vicinity, including signs indicating the presence of a bicycle lane. However, there were no signs indicating that the bicycle lane continued through the intersection. The court held that this lack of signage created a dangerous condition that contributed to the plaintiff’s injuries.

The court also rejected the defendant’s argument that the plaintiff was partially at fault for the accident. The defendant claimed that the plaintiff was traveling too fast and that he failed to keep a proper lookout. However, the court found that the plaintiff was traveling at a reasonable speed and that he was not at fault for the accident.

Conclusion
Fox v. City of New York highlights the importance of proper signage in ensuring the safety of cyclists on New York City streets. Inadequate or confusing signs can cause accidents and injuries, as was the case in this instance. Municipalities have a responsibility to ensure that their streets are safe for all users, including cyclists. This includes providing clear and effective signage to guide cyclists and motorists through intersections and other areas where conflicts may arise.

If you have been injured in a bicycle accident in New York City, it is important to consult with an experienced New York bike accident lawyer who can help you navigate the complex legal and regulatory framework that governs bicycle accidents in New York City, including the rules regarding signage and other traffic control devices. With the right legal representation, you can protect your rights and maximize your chances of obtaining a favorable outcome in your case.

by
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:

Comments are closed.

Contact Information