New York Personal Injury Lawyer Blog 24/7
In Adames v. Sheepshead Bay Rd. R.R. Co., the New York Court of Appeals addressed the issue of whether a common carrier can be held liable for injuries sustained by a passenger when the passenger voluntarily disembarks from the carrier’s vehicle before reaching their destination. The case is significant because it clarifies the scope of a common carrier’s duty to its passengers and provides guidance on the circumstances under which a carrier can be held liable for injuries sustained by a passenger.
Factual Background
The plaintiff in Adames was a passenger on a bus operated by the Sheepshead Bay Road Railroad Company. The bus was traveling along Ocean Parkway in Brooklyn when the plaintiff signaled the driver to stop so that he could disembark. The plaintiff exited the bus and began to walk across the street, but was struck by a passing car and sustained serious injuries.
The plaintiff subsequently brought suit against the bus company, alleging that it was negligent in failing to provide him with a safe place to disembark and failing to warn him of the dangers of crossing the street. The bus company moved for summary judgment, arguing that it had no duty to the plaintiff once he had voluntarily disembarked from the bus.
Decision
The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the bus company, finding that the plaintiff had assumed the risk of injury by choosing to disembark from the bus and cross the street. The plaintiff appealed, and the Appellate Division affirmed.
The plaintiff then appealed to the Court of Appeals, which reversed. The court held that the bus company had a duty to exercise reasonable care to protect its passengers from harm, even after they had voluntarily disembarked from the bus. The court found that the bus company had breached this duty by failing to warn the plaintiff of the dangers of crossing the street and failing to ensure that he had a safe place to disembark.
Discussion
The Adames decision is significant because it clarifies the scope of a common carrier’s duty to its passengers. The court held that a common carrier owes a duty of reasonable care to its passengers throughout the entire duration of the journey, including the process of disembarking from the carrier’s vehicle. The court noted that the duty is not absolute, but rather depends on the circumstances of each case.
The court also clarified the circumstances under which a common carrier can be held liable for injuries sustained by a passenger. The court held that a carrier can be held liable for injuries sustained by a passenger if the carrier breached its duty of reasonable care and the breach was a proximate cause of the injuries. In Adames, the court found that the bus company had breached its duty by failing to warn the plaintiff of the dangers of crossing the street and failing to ensure that he had a safe place to disembark, and that this breach was a proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries.
The court’s decision in Adames has been cited in numerous subsequent cases involving common carrier liability. For example, in the case of Di Maura v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Auth., 108 A.D.2d 898, 485 N.Y.S.2d 137 (2d Dep’t 1985), the court held that a bus company could be held liable for injuries sustained by a passenger who fell while disembarking from a bus, even though the passenger had signaled the driver to stop in an area where there was no designated bus stop.
Conclusion
The Adames decision clarifies the scope of a common carrier’s duty to its passengers and provides guidance on the circumstances under which a carrier can be held liable for injuries sustained by a passenger. If you are injured in car accident or bus accident, contact an experienced New York personal injury lawyer. Such cases can be complicated. It’s important to have legal representation to help ensure that your interests are protected.