Published on:

Appellate Division determined that plaintiff presented enough evidence to proceed with her product liability claim. Ippolito v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 121 A.D.3d 529 (2d Dep’t 2014)

by

In Ippolito v. Sears Roebuck & Co., the plaintiff, Linda Ippolito, alleged that she was injured by a defective product that she purchased from Sears Roebuck & Co. This case demonstrates the importance of product liability law and the duty that manufacturers and sellers have to ensure the safety of their products.

A product liability case is a legal case brought against a manufacturer, seller, or distributor of a product that has caused harm or injury to a consumer. The basis for the case is that the product is considered defective, either due to a design flaw, manufacturing defect, or a failure to provide adequate warnings or instructions for use. In a product liability case, the injured party seeks compensation for their injuries, including medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. These cases can be complex and often require the assistance of an experienced New York product liability lawyer with expertise in product liability law.

Factual Background
In 2008, Linda Ippolito purchased a Craftsman wet/dry vac from Sears Roebuck & Co. The vacuum cleaner came with a hose that was attached to the canister of the vacuum cleaner by a metal tube. On June 18, 2010, Linda was using the vacuum cleaner to clean her basement when the metal tube detached from the canister and struck her in the face. Linda suffered injuries as a result of the incident, including a broken nose, a laceration on her upper lip, and injuries to her teeth.

Linda brought a lawsuit against Sears Roebuck & Co., alleging that the company was negligent in the design, manufacture, and sale of the vacuum cleaner. Linda claimed that the vacuum cleaner was defective and that Sears was aware of the defect or should have been aware of the defect. Sears denied any wrongdoing and argued that the vacuum cleaner was safe and that Linda’s injuries were caused by her own negligence.

Decision
The trial court granted Sears’ motion for summary judgment, which meant that the case was dismissed without a trial. The trial court found that Linda had not presented enough evidence to support her claim that the vacuum cleaner was defective or that Sears had knowledge of the defect. Linda appealed the decision to the Appellate Division, Second Department.

The Appellate Division reversed the trial court’s decision and sent the case back to the trial court for further proceedings. The Appellate Division found that Linda had presented enough evidence to create a question of fact as to whether the vacuum cleaner was defective and whether Sears had knowledge of the defect. The Appellate Division also found that Linda had presented evidence to show that the vacuum cleaner was used in a reasonably foreseeable manner.

Discussion
The Appellate Division’s decision in Ippolito v. Sears Roebuck & Co. highlights the importance of product liability law and the duty that manufacturers and sellers have to ensure the safety of their products. In this case, Linda Ippolito was injured as a result of a defect in a vacuum cleaner that she purchased from Sears Roebuck & Co. Linda claimed that Sears was aware of the defect or should have been aware of the defect and that the company was negligent in the design, manufacture, and sale of the vacuum cleaner.

The trial court dismissed Linda’s case, finding that she had not presented enough evidence to support her claims. However, the Appellate Division found that Linda had presented enough evidence to create a question of fact as to whether the vacuum cleaner was defective and whether Sears had knowledge of the defect. The Appellate Division’s decision shows that manufacturers and sellers have a duty to ensure the safety of their products and that consumers have a right to seek redress if they are injured as a result of a defective product.

Conclusion
Ippolito v. Sears Roebuck & Co. case underscores the value of retaining an experienced New York product liability lawyer if you have been injured due to a defective product. Product liability cases can be complex, and require a thorough understanding of the law and the ability to investigate the facts to build a strong case. An attorney with experience can help you navigate the legal system and ensure that your rights are protected. If you or a loved one has been injured due to a defective product, it is important to seek legal counsel as soon as possible to maximize your chances of recovering the compensation you deserve.

Contact Information